Former Prime Minister Imran Khan has sparked fresh debate by asserting that he would rather see Pakistan governed under a monarchy than witness the implementation of the proposed 27th Constitutional Amendment—a move he claims would erode judicial independence and democratic integrity.
A New Flashpoint in Constitutional Tussle
Imran’s latest comments come amid public concern around government efforts to modify the Constitution again—this time to expand parliamentary control over judicial appointments and extend military leadership tenures.
In a fiery press briefing, he warned that such changes would render Pakistan’s democracy a mere facade, urging the public to view the amendment as an existential threat. He emphasized that bypassing thorough debate or consensus—especially after similar controversy over the 26th Amendment—signals a disturbing trend, likening it to the establishment of a “monarchy” within Pakistan’s democratic structures .
Monarchy’ Over 27th Amendment?
The former premier’s provocative statement—preferring a monarchy over the amendment—was not literal praise for monarchy itself. Instead, Imran used it as hyperbole to criticize what he sees as extreme centralization of power:
“They would rather see monarchy rule than give parliament this unchecked authority,” he said, accusing the government of orchestrating a constitutional takeover .
In his view, the 27th Amendment poses a worse threat to democracy than a monarchy because it would institutionalize the manipulation of both judiciary and bureaucracy by the ruling elite.
Judicial Independence at Stake
Central to Imran’s argument is the claim that previous amendments—like the 26th—already infringed on judicial autonomy. He maintains that adding further powers for political appointment mechanisms risks converting courts into partisan tools rather than impartial arbiters.
He also pointed to other critics, including PTI and allied parties, who have promised to resist any constitutional alteration that might undermine democratic norms. One member asserted, “Whether it’s the 27th amendment or 28th, the PTI will oppose it“
Political Ramifications
Imran’s dramatic framing has reignited discussions around civil–military power, party politics, and legal authority in Pakistan. Supporters applaud his stance as courageous, arguing that it highlights the authoritarian tendencies seeping into governance.
Critics, however, dismiss his monarchy rhetoric as hyperbolic and polarizing—potentially distracting from constructive debate on improving constitutional mechanisms.
Next Steps & What to Watch
- Government Position: Ruling party leaders have yet to formally respond. Key ministries, such as Information Minister Attaullah Tarar, previously denied any serious discussion of a 27th Amendment.
- Parliamentary Developments: Shifts could occur fast, especially if the government secures alliances. Watch the National and Provincial Assemblies in coming sessions.
- Judiciary’s Role: Observers are paying close attention to whether the Supreme Court or high courts will weigh in if amendments threaten judicial autonomy.
Final Word
Imran Khan’s assertion—preferring monarchy over a constitutionally engineered “monarchy by amendment”—serves as a stark warning. Whether viewed as dramatic exaggeration or a valid alarm, it underscores the fragility of Pakistan’s democratic institutions and the need for public vigilance in constitutional reforms.